<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mafic content Archives - Geology North</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.geologynorth.uk/tag/mafic-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.geologynorth.uk/tag/mafic-content/</link>
	<description>No vestige of a beginning, - no prospect of an end</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2020 14:49:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.3</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Upper Harthope Valley</title>
		<link>https://www.geologynorth.uk/harthope-nov-2016/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2016 18:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorised]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breccia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Central Belt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[erosion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[haematite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harthope Linn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harthope valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrothermal alteration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mafic content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pluton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quartz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[volcanic vent]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geologynorth.uk/?p=19100</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>On Tuesday 29th November we set out to make a more detailed study of the rocks in the upper Harthope Valley above Harthope Linn. We believe from preliminary samples that these may differ significantly from the granitic rocks of the Cheviot pluton. The day is bright and cold with a hard frost promising to make &#8230; <a href="https://www.geologynorth.uk/harthope-nov-2016/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Upper Harthope Valley</span> <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.geologynorth.uk/harthope-nov-2016/">Upper Harthope Valley</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.geologynorth.uk">Geology North</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='jsn-bootstrap3'>
<div id='FTVWLE' class='row '  style='padding-top:10px;padding-bottom:10px;padding-left:10px;padding-right:10px;'>
<div class="col-md-12 col-sm-12 col-xs-12 " >
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-text' >
<div class="wr_text" id="jDETg4">
<p>On Tuesday 29th November we set out to make a more detailed study of the rocks in the upper Harthope Valley above Harthope Linn. We believe from preliminary samples that these may differ significantly from the granitic rocks of the Cheviot pluton. The day is bright and cold with a hard frost promising to make boggy ground easier to walk over. The furthest permitted parking is at the Hawsen Burn just below Langleeford. From there it is a long but easy farm track to Langleefordhope, and then about a quarter of a mile to the lower Harthope Linn close to the stell (circular sheepfold). After that, the going becomes much rougher with several potentially difficult burn crossings.</p>
<p>The rocks outcropping above the stell prove to be granitic Central Belt group although rather more mafic than usual. Similarly the dyke-like outcrop beside the path about 200 yards above the upper Harthope Linn, is also granitic. This rock seems to give rise to a fairly even rolling hillsides.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-divider' style='margin-bottom:25px '>
<div style="width: 100%;border-bottom-width:2px;border-bottom-style:solid;border-bottom-color:#ffffff;margin-bottom:25px"></div>
</div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-image' ><img width='966' height='724' src='http://www.geologynorth.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/007.jpg' /></div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-text' >
<div class="wr_text" id="0dOEZb">
<p><strong>Looking down the Harthope Valley from near Harthope Linn.<br />
</strong>The granitic rocks of granite/quartz-monzonite give smooth rounded slopes.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-divider' style='margin-bottom:25px '>
<div style="width: 100%;border-bottom-width:2px;border-bottom-style:solid;border-bottom-color:#ffffff;margin-bottom:25px"></div>
</div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-text' >
<div class="wr_text" id="wSX8pq">
<p>From this point onwards, the type of rock changes consistently. We checked this most of the way to the watershed. The rock appears to be a form of breccia. In many places it has obviously been severely shattered. In other places it seems more stratified and less disturbed. Because of the shattered nature of the rock, it erodes into gullies more readily giving a more irregular pattern to the slopes of the hills.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-divider' style='margin-bottom:25px '>
<div style="width: 100%;border-bottom-width:2px;border-bottom-style:solid;border-bottom-color:#ffffff;margin-bottom:25px"></div>
</div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-image' ><img width='966' height='724' src='http://www.geologynorth.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/024.jpg' /></div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-text' >
<div class="wr_text" id="3oSlnA">
<p><strong>A view looking up the Harthope Valley from above Harthope Linn.<br />
</strong>The erosion gullies formed from the breccia rocks can be clearly seen.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-divider' style='margin-bottom:25px '>
<div style="width: 100%;border-bottom-width:2px;border-bottom-style:solid;border-bottom-color:#ffffff;margin-bottom:25px"></div>
</div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-image' ><img width='966' height='724' src='http://www.geologynorth.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/013.jpg' /></div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-text' >
<div class="wr_text" id="e8HJrT">
<p>An outcrop of typical breccia.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-divider' style='margin-bottom:25px '>
<div style="width: 100%;border-bottom-width:2px;border-bottom-style:solid;border-bottom-color:#ffffff;margin-bottom:25px"></div>
</div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-image' ><img width='966' height='724' src='http://www.geologynorth.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/018.jpg' /></div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-text' >
<div class="wr_text" id="iJmxq8">
<p><strong>An outcrop of stratified breccia.</strong></p>
</div>
</div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-divider' style='margin-bottom:25px '>
<div style="width: 100%;border-bottom-width:2px;border-bottom-style:solid;border-bottom-color:#ffffff;margin-bottom:25px"></div>
</div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-text' >
<div class="wr_text" id="G3GGdL">
<p>The breccia has been cemented together by silica and red haematite. The silica occasionally has space to crystallise out into attractive quartz crystals, mostly rock crystal but a few specimens show a hint of mauve. Occasionally, veinlets of black tourmaline appear with the quartz.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-divider' style='margin-bottom:25px '>
<div style="width: 100%;border-bottom-width:2px;border-bottom-style:solid;border-bottom-color:#ffffff;margin-bottom:25px"></div>
</div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-text' >
<div class="wr_text" id="m1jEks">
<p>The Harthope valley marks the line of a SW-NE fault almost bisecting the pluton. Lateral displacement can be detected from the plutonic/lava margins on either side of the fault, and can be measured to about a quarter of a mile. Vertical movement, if any, is unknown. The faulting begs the question whether the breccia is a product of a crush zone, or evidence for volcanic vent activity. We remain uncertain about this. However, certain conclusions can be drawn. The breccia must have been cemented together under high temperatures for crystalline silica and tourmaline to have been deposited. The flatter layers imply more stable conditions for at least some of the hydrothermal activity. The presence of haematite (ferric oxide) indicates oxidising conditions but whether these were the result of iron reacting with high temperature water vapour inside the magma chamber, or exposure to the air at a vent, is uncertain.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-divider' style='margin-bottom:25px '>
<div style="width: 100%;border-bottom-width:2px;border-bottom-style:solid;border-bottom-color:#ffffff;margin-bottom:25px"></div>
</div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-image' ><img width='966' height='724' src='http://www.geologynorth.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/011.jpg' /></div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-text' >
<div class="wr_text" id="malTur">
<p><strong>Severely shattered breccia outcrop</strong></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.geologynorth.uk/harthope-nov-2016/">Upper Harthope Valley</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.geologynorth.uk">Geology North</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bellyside Crag and Upper Goldscleugh Sike</title>
		<link>https://www.geologynorth.uk/bellyside-crag-and-upper-goldscleugh-sike/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2016 19:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorised]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al-Hafdh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[andesite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bellyside Hill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biotite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boundaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feldspar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[granite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kinematic action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mafic content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marginal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pyroxene]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geologynorth.uk/?p=18953</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>We buy a 10.00 GBP day permit from Savills, Glendale Road, Wooler and drive up the College Valley to Dunsdale where we start our walk up Bellyside Hill. The purpose of the expedition is to examine the granitic rock at the northern end of the pluton at Bellyside Crag which is classified by Al-Hafdh and &#8230; <a href="https://www.geologynorth.uk/bellyside-crag-and-upper-goldscleugh-sike/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Bellyside Crag and Upper Goldscleugh Sike</span> <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.geologynorth.uk/bellyside-crag-and-upper-goldscleugh-sike/">Bellyside Crag and Upper Goldscleugh Sike</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.geologynorth.uk">Geology North</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='jsn-bootstrap3'>
<div id='z4O3H3' class='row '  style='padding-top:10px;padding-bottom:10px;padding-left:10px;padding-right:10px;'>
<div class="col-md-12 col-sm-12 col-xs-12 " >
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-text' >
<div class="wr_text" id="GcFbgd">
<p>We buy a 10.00 GBP day permit from <a href="http://www.savills-smithsgore.co.uk/" target="_new">Savills</a>, Glendale Road, Wooler and drive up the College Valley to Dunsdale where we start our  walk up Bellyside Hill. The purpose of the expedition is to examine the granitic rock at the northern end of the pluton at Bellyside Crag which is classified by Al-Hafdh and by previous writers as &lsquo;Marginal&rsquo; like the rock of Cunyon Crag and Dunmoor Hill on the south east side of the pluton. We also hope to find and examine the andesite outlier mapped at the head of Goldscleugh to see if it gives any clues as to its relationship with the pluton.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-divider' style='margin-bottom:25px '>
<div style="width: 100%;border-bottom-width:2px;border-bottom-style:solid;border-bottom-color:#ffffff;margin-bottom:25px"></div>
</div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-image' ><img width='876' height='657' src='http://www.geologynorth.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/006-Goldscleugh.jpg' alt='Bellyside Hill' /></div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-text' >
<div class="wr_text" id="O2G0h8">
<p><strong>View from Bellyside Hill looking up towards Goldscleugh Sike</strong><br />
The ground behind is the summit plateau of the Cheviot.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-divider' style='margin-bottom:25px '>
<div style="width: 100%;border-bottom-width:2px;border-bottom-style:solid;border-bottom-color:#ffffff;margin-bottom:25px"></div>
</div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-text' >
<div class="wr_text" id="ElhhL5">
<p>Bellyside Hill is Cheviot&rsquo;s closest approximation to a classic ridge walk. Until about 600m there is a good path passing a series of granitic tors on the way. These are composed of a granitic but in appearance mafic rock with occasional felsic intrusions of pink rock.<br />
At about 600m the path disappears and the only way forward is through tiresome blanket bog vegetation.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-divider' style='margin-bottom:25px '>
<div style="width: 100%;border-bottom-width:2px;border-bottom-style:solid;border-bottom-color:#ffffff;margin-bottom:25px"></div>
</div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-image' ><img width='876' height='657' src='http://www.geologynorth.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/007-Hill.jpg' alt='View looking north down Bellyside Hill showing the outcropping tors' /></div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-text' >
<div class="wr_text" id="v2KAtQ">
<p><strong>View looking north down Bellyside Hill showing the outcropping tors</strong></p>
</div>
</div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-divider' style='margin-bottom:25px '>
<div style="width: 100%;border-bottom-width:2px;border-bottom-style:solid;border-bottom-color:#ffffff;margin-bottom:25px"></div>
</div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-image' ><img width='873' height='678' src='http://www.geologynorth.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Hammer.jpg' alt='View looking north down Bellyside Hill showing the outcropping tors' /></div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-text' >
<div class="wr_text" id="sG8UAn">
<p><strong>A felsic phase or dyke in one of the tors on Bellyside Hill</strong></p>
</div>
</div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-divider' style='margin-bottom:25px '>
<div style="width: 100%;border-bottom-width:2px;border-bottom-style:solid;border-bottom-color:#ffffff;margin-bottom:25px"></div>
</div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-text' >
<div class="wr_text" id="hxxMCR">
<p>Upper Goldscleugh reveals some rather heavily altered rock which may possibly be andesite, but it occurs as scattered blocks and pebbles, so it is impossible to determine any relationship with the pluton. If it is indeed andesite, its altered state indicates that it must have originated from close to the pluton contact.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-text' >
<div class="wr_text" id="WC6h98">
<p>We now tramp over to Bellyside Crag. This turns out to be composed of a mafic granitic rock similar to that found on the tors of Bellyside Hill.<br />
The screes around the crag have a large colony of clubmosses.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-divider' style='margin-bottom:25px '>
<div style="width: 100%;border-bottom-width:2px;border-bottom-style:solid;border-bottom-color:#ffffff;margin-bottom:25px"></div>
</div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-image' ><img width='946' height='567' src='http://www.geologynorth.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Bside.jpg' alt='Thin section of rock from Bellyside Crag viewed with crossed polars at X40' /></div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-text' >
<div class="wr_text" id="QAIzje">
<p><strong>Thin section of rock from Bellyside Crag viewed with crossed polars at X40</strong><br />
Granophyric texture can be seen in several places. There is a large crystal of clinopyroxene at the bottom of the picture.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-divider' style='margin-bottom:25px '>
<div style="width: 100%;border-bottom-width:2px;border-bottom-style:solid;border-bottom-color:#ffffff;margin-bottom:25px"></div>
</div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-text' >
<div class="wr_text" id="YiuYGN">
<p>Subsequent thin section analysis reveals some interesting facts. The rocks of Bellyside Hill and Bellyside Crag are very similar to each other although the Bellyside Hill specimens may have a slightly higher proportion of alkali feldspar. However, neither are anything like the &lsquo;Marginal&rsquo; rock of Dunmoor Hill and Cunyon Crag.<br />
The Bellyside Hill specimens have a lower proportion of plagioclase to alkali feldspar (identifiable feldspars show a ratio of about 1:2, plagioclase to alkali feldspar); there is very little biotite, the main mafic mineral being pyroxene (10-15%); quartz content is similar at about 20%. It also has a more marked fine matrix than the southern Marginal with frequent granophyric texture.<br />
It therefore seems rather doubtful that it has the same origin as the southern Marginal rock.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-text' >
<div class="wr_text" id="oDDwiq">
<p>As regards the &#8220;andesite&#8221; of upper Goldscleugh Sike, if we are correct in identifying this as a granite/andesite contact, both the andesite and granite show clear signs of banding which may indicate contact compression.<br />
Apart from the contact on Shiel Cleugh Edge, this is the only evidence for kinematic action which we have found on Cheviot. Where it exists it appears to be very localised. However, we remain rather uncertain whether the rock from upper Goldscleugh Sike was andesite or just an altered granitic rock.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-divider' style='margin-bottom:25px '>
<div style="width: 100%;border-bottom-width:2px;border-bottom-style:solid;border-bottom-color:#ffffff;margin-bottom:25px"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.geologynorth.uk/bellyside-crag-and-upper-goldscleugh-sike/">Bellyside Crag and Upper Goldscleugh Sike</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.geologynorth.uk">Geology North</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Woolhope Crag</title>
		<link>https://www.geologynorth.uk/woolhope-crag/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 18:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorised]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al-Hafdh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolved granite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fine-grained]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mafic content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Woolhope Crag]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geologynorth.uk/?p=18934</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Woolhope Crag lies on the north east flank of the Cheviot just above Goldscleugh. It is one of the few convincing outcrops on the Cheviot itself. When we first visited it in 2013, we were looking for, and thought we had found, evidence that the outcrops occur because of the presence of harder, more mafic &#8230; <a href="https://www.geologynorth.uk/woolhope-crag/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Woolhope Crag</span> <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.geologynorth.uk/woolhope-crag/">Woolhope Crag</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.geologynorth.uk">Geology North</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='jsn-bootstrap3'>
<div id='QXQ9Ye' class='row '  style='padding-top:10px;padding-bottom:10px;padding-left:10px;padding-right:10px;'>
<div class="col-md-12 col-sm-12 col-xs-12 " >
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-text' >
<div class="wr_text" id="qnP1CY">
<p>Woolhope Crag lies on the north east flank of the Cheviot just above Goldscleugh. It is one of the few convincing outcrops on the Cheviot itself. When we first visited it in 2013, we were looking for, and thought we had found, evidence that the outcrops occur because of the presence of harder, more mafic rock.<br />
Subsequently, we read Al-Hafdh&rsquo;s thesis which uses Woolhope Crag as the type location for his &lsquo;Woolhope&rsquo; variety which is the <em><strong>least</strong></em> mafic, and therefore the most felsic and silica-rich, of his classifications.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-divider' style='margin-bottom:25px '>
<div style="width: 100%;border-bottom-width:2px;border-bottom-style:solid;border-bottom-color:#ffffff;margin-bottom:25px"></div>
</div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-image' ><img width='876' height='657' src='http://www.geologynorth.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Woolhope-Crag-Aug-2016.jpg' alt='Woolhope Crag from the East' /></div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-text' >
<div class="wr_text" id="OnKpx8">
<p><strong>Woolhope Crag from the East</strong><br />
The break on the right is where the felsic rock (left) becomes more mafic.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-divider' style='margin-bottom:25px '>
<div style="width: 100%;border-bottom-width:2px;border-bottom-style:solid;border-bottom-color:#ffffff;margin-bottom:25px"></div>
</div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-text' >
<div class="wr_text" id="CY6VzS">
<p>I returned here on19 August 2016 to investigate this apparent contradiction.<br />
The answer is relatively simple. The southern end (higher end) of the crag is felsic; the northern (lower) end is more mafic in appearance. The join occurs at the broken mid-point of the crag. It is not an abrupt contact but a gradual change over about 20 cm and appears at first sight to be an example of fractionation &ndash; the first we have discovered in the Cheviot pluton.</span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-divider' style='margin-bottom:25px '>
<div style="width: 100%;border-bottom-width:2px;border-bottom-style:solid;border-bottom-color:#ffffff;margin-bottom:25px"></div>
</div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-image' ><img width='972' height='576' src='http://www.geologynorth.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/W-upper.jpg' /></div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-text' >
<div class="wr_text" id="9HWTN0">
<p><strong>Thin section of the upper (more felsic) rock at Woolhope Crag viewed with crossed polars at X40</strong><br />
There are some large phenocrysts of alkali feldspar showing Carlsbad twinning.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-divider' style='margin-bottom:25px '>
<div style="width: 100%;border-bottom-width:2px;border-bottom-style:solid;border-bottom-color:#ffffff;margin-bottom:25px"></div>
</div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-text' >
<div class="wr_text" id="SZBklQ">
<p>This theory breaks down when the two types are compared in thin section.<br />
There seems to be very little difference in content between the two. Thin section analysis suggests that the difference between them is more apparent to the eye in hand specimen than actual. There is a slight increase in plagioclase with the more mafic rock but no increase in mafic minerals (both around 7%). The darker colour is probably due to the smaller grain size of the lower darker rock. Identifiable feldspars in both types show a ratio of about 1:3, plagioclase to alkali. Both types are rich enough in quartz (25-30%) and alkali feldspar to be classified as granite, albeit a relatively fine-grained variety.<br />
An interesting feature of the upper more felsic rock is the presence of frequent chlorite.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-divider' style='margin-bottom:25px '>
<div style="width: 100%;border-bottom-width:2px;border-bottom-style:solid;border-bottom-color:#ffffff;margin-bottom:25px"></div>
</div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-image' ><img width='968' height='576' src='http://www.geologynorth.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/W-lower.jpg' /></div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-text' >
<div class="wr_text" id="F6D2ot">
<p><strong>Thin section of the lower (&#8216;mafic&#8217;) rock at Woolhope Crag viewed with crossed polars at X40</strong><br />
There is no increase in mafic content compared with the more felsic rock. However, the grain size of the matrix is much smaller which must account for the darker appearance.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div   class='jsn-bootstrap3 wr-element-container wr-element-divider' style='margin-bottom:25px '>
<div style="width: 100%;border-bottom-width:2px;border-bottom-style:solid;border-bottom-color:#ffffff;margin-bottom:25px"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.geologynorth.uk/woolhope-crag/">Woolhope Crag</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.geologynorth.uk">Geology North</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dunmoor Hill</title>
		<link>https://www.geologynorth.uk/16886/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2014 16:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorised]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dunmoor Hill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local fractionation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mafic content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quartz monzo-diorite]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geologynorth.uk/?p=16886</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>I trace samples of dioritic ‘Marginal’ rock between NT 97475 17206 and NT 96914 17281 to see whether there is any significant change in mafic content approaching the junction with the andesite.I found no evidence, at least on Dunmoor Hill, for increasing mafic content towards the perimeter of the pluton. There are however local variations &#8230; <a href="https://www.geologynorth.uk/16886/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Dunmoor Hill</span> <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.geologynorth.uk/16886/">Dunmoor Hill</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.geologynorth.uk">Geology North</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>I trace samples of dioritic ‘Marginal’ rock between NT 97475 17206 and NT 96914 17281 to see whether there is any significant change in mafic content approaching the junction with the andesite.<br>I found no evidence, at least on Dunmoor Hill, for increasing mafic content towards the perimeter of the pluton. There are however local variations which are consistent with the principle of local fractionation bands within the Marginal.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.geologynorth.uk/16886/">Dunmoor Hill</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.geologynorth.uk">Geology North</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dunmoor Hill</title>
		<link>https://www.geologynorth.uk/dunmoor-hill/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2014 22:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorised]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al-Hafdh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[andesite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aplite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boundaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chilled margin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cunyon Crags]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dunmoor Hill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[felsic content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[granophyric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hornfels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intrusion sequence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mafic content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medium-grained porphyritic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ring dyke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thin-section]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vein]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geologynorth.uk/?p=16875</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>We go to Dunmoor Hill in search of Al-Hafdh’s hitherto elusive chilled margins. Dunmoor Hill is a particularly good site as exposure, unlike in many areas of the Cheviot hills, is plentiful. We are finding Al-Hafdh’s thesis on the Cheviot pluton immensely stimulating. It has provided clear direction to our own research, although we are &#8230; <a href="https://www.geologynorth.uk/dunmoor-hill/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Dunmoor Hill</span> <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.geologynorth.uk/dunmoor-hill/">Dunmoor Hill</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.geologynorth.uk">Geology North</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We go to Dunmoor Hill in search of Al-Hafdh’s hitherto elusive chilled margins. Dunmoor Hill is a particularly good site as exposure, unlike in many areas of the Cheviot hills, is plentiful. We are finding Al-Hafdh’s thesis on the Cheviot pluton immensely stimulating. It has provided clear direction to our own research, although we are beginning to doubt his proposal that the Cheviot pluton consisted of a series of ring dykes.<br />
The area below Cunyon Crags has plenty of small outcrops where we find a bewildering mixture of felsic and mafic fine-grained material. At first, we think that the mafic rock is altered andesite. However, thin sections show very well-developed granophyric texture in the felsic rock which imply late intrusion into already established plutonic bodies. The mafic rock has a very high biotite/opaque iron oxide content, and appears to be restite.<br />
Subsequently, we are able to trace the junction between the pink rock (Al-Hafdh’s Dunmoor type) and the more mafic Marginal rocks right across the south slope of Dunmoor Hill. The junction doesn&#8217;t show a clear cut boundary but it does present frequent inter-penetration of the two types. The implication is that neither type was fully consolidated when the intrusion took place.<br />
We are still unable to find any chilled margins to confirm an intrusion sequence. Finer rocks always turn out to be aplite veins or small dykes.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.geologynorth.uk/dunmoor-hill/">Dunmoor Hill</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.geologynorth.uk">Geology North</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Woolhope Crag and the Cheviot</title>
		<link>https://www.geologynorth.uk/woolhope-crag-and-the-cheviot/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 21:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorised]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boundaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolved granite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[excursions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fine-grained]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harthope valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrothermal alteration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypotheses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mafic content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quartz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quartz monzo-diorite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Cheviot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tourmaline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wool hope crag]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geologynorth.uk/?p=16867</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>We go to see if the theory of the darker rocks making tougher landscape features, would hold at Woolhope Crag (NT 92264 22169). The answer was ambiguous. There is certainly plenty of dioritic rock there but there is also a pale fine-grained granophyric rock. We subsequently made our way up the north slopes of the &#8230; <a href="https://www.geologynorth.uk/woolhope-crag-and-the-cheviot/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Woolhope Crag and the Cheviot</span> <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.geologynorth.uk/woolhope-crag-and-the-cheviot/">Woolhope Crag and the Cheviot</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.geologynorth.uk">Geology North</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We go to see if the theory of the darker rocks making tougher landscape features, would hold at Woolhope Crag (NT 92264 22169).<br />
The answer was ambiguous. There is certainly plenty of dioritic rock there but there is also a pale fine-grained granophyric rock. We subsequently made our way up the north slopes of the Cheviot, and found plenty of scattered exposures which revealed more of the granophyric rock. We have classified this type on the map as ‘Evolved’ granite.<br />
Descending from Cheviot summit on the main path for Langlee in the Harthope valley, we found distinct quartz veining with tourmaline content (approx. NT 918 209). There is the possibility that this quartz veining is the result of hydrothermal penetration on lines of weakness between different types of plutonic rock.<br />
We need to pay another visit to investigate this.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.geologynorth.uk/woolhope-crag-and-the-cheviot/">Woolhope Crag and the Cheviot</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.geologynorth.uk">Geology North</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A hypothesis and an excursion to Harthope Linn</title>
		<link>https://www.geologynorth.uk/an-hypothesis-and-excursion-to-harthope-linn/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 20:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorised]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[andesite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carey Burn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Davidson's Linn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harthope Linn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrothermal alteration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linhope Spout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mafic content]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geologynorth.uk/?p=16863</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p> Harthope Linn (NT 92734 20229) We are pursuing the idea that the rocky features in the mostly rounded Cheviot Hills were caused by a more mafic content making the rocks harder. This would account for waterfalls such as Harthope Linn and Linhope Spout. Field work has shown that the andesite at the Carey Burn Linn &#8230; <a href="https://www.geologynorth.uk/an-hypothesis-and-excursion-to-harthope-linn/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">A hypothesis and an excursion to Harthope Linn</span> <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.geologynorth.uk/an-hypothesis-and-excursion-to-harthope-linn/">A hypothesis and an excursion to Harthope Linn</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.geologynorth.uk">Geology North</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong> Harthope Linn (NT 92734 20229)</strong></p>
<p>We are pursuing the idea that the rocky features in the mostly rounded Cheviot Hills were caused by a more mafic content making the rocks harder. This would account for waterfalls such as Harthope Linn and Linhope Spout. Field work has shown that the andesite at the Carey Burn Linn and at Davidson’s Linn are of the dark harder variety.</p>
<p>There seems to be considerable variety in the rocks of the Cheviot pluton. The 1” geological survey shows the whole area as ‘granite’ but it is also apparent that the visible mineral content make this classification doubtful. This has led me to begin working with Ian to investigate and map the area in an effort to find out what is there and to better understand how it came to be so .</p>
<p>Today’s work at Harthope Linn did reveal rocks with a high colour index and mafic content but there were also other paler varieties and some showing substantial alteration.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.geologynorth.uk/an-hypothesis-and-excursion-to-harthope-linn/">A hypothesis and an excursion to Harthope Linn</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.geologynorth.uk">Geology North</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
